Child Social Vulnerability and Child Marriage Practices in Grobogan Regency: A Context-Based Analysis of Child Protection Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58684/paradigma.v3i1.100Keywords:
Child Marriage, Child Vulnerability, Gender Inequality, Local Governance, Public PolicyAbstract
This study examines the phenomenon of child marriage in Grobogan Regency by focusing on the relationship between child vulnerability and the effectiveness of child protection policies within a local context. Despite the revision of the legal minimum marriage age to 19 years through Law No. 16 of 2019, child marriage remains a persistent social issue. Data from the Religious Court of Purwodadi indicate that there were 562 cases in 2024, 463 cases in 2025, and 152 cases from January to April 2026, totaling 1,177 cases. This condition highlights a significant gap between policy formulation and its implementation at the local level. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, this study explores the multidimensional vulnerability of children, particularly girls, which includes economic hardship, limited access to education, weak bargaining power within families, and strong socio-cultural pressures. The findings reveal that child marriage is not merely an individual choice but a structural outcome shaped by gender inequality and restricted capabilities. Furthermore, social norms and community influence play a crucial role in sustaining the practice, often overriding formal legal frameworks. Although various prevention efforts have been implemented through policy interventions, socialization programs, and institutional coordination, these efforts remain fragmented and insufficiently integrated. The study concludes that addressing child marriage requires a comprehensive and multisectoral approach that combines legal enforcement, economic empowerment, educational access, and transformation of social norms. Strengthening local governance capacity and community engagement is essential to ensure more effective and sustainable child protection policies.
References
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Perkawinan anak di Indonesia 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Statistik kemiskinan Kabupaten Grobogan 2024–2025. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Bappenas. (2020). Strategi nasional pencegahan perkawinan anak (Stranas PPA). Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Connell, R. (2009). Gender: In world perspective (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill.
Ewerling, F., Lynch, J. W., Victora, C. G., van Eerdewijk, A., Tyszler, M., & Barros, A. J. D. (2021). The SWPER index for women’s empowerment in Africa: Development and validation of an index based on survey data. The Lancet Global Health, 9(6), e916–e923. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00078-8
Fakih, M. (2013). Analisis gender dan transformasi sosial. Pustaka Pelajar.
Grindle, M. S. (1980). Politics and policy implementation in the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak. (2020). Strategi nasional pencegahan perkawinan anak. Kemen PPPA.
Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak. (2025). Peraturan Menteri PPPA Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 tentang Dana Pelayanan Perlindungan Perempuan dan Anak.
Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. Sage Publications.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2024). Laporan tahunan permohonan dispensasi kawin. Mahkamah Agung RI.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Nahar, S., et al. (2021). Women’s empowerment and child health: Evidence from developing countries. Social Science & Medicine, 270, 113625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113625
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Pengadilan Agama Purwodadi. (2026). Data perkara dispensasi kawin Kabupaten Grobogan tahun 2024–April 2026.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.
UNICEF. (2021). Child marriage: Latest trends and future prospects. UNICEF.
UNICEF. (2023). Child marriage: Global trends and future projections. UNICEF.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
